🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he endured a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.