🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as one of the most deadly – and consequential – days during multiple decades of unrest in the region.

Within the community where events unfolded – the images of Bloody Sunday are painted on the buildings and seared in people's minds.

A protest demonstration was organized on a wintry, sunny afternoon in Londonderry.

The march was a protest against the practice of internment – imprisoning people without legal proceedings – which had been implemented after multiple years of conflict.

Soldiers from the elite army unit killed thirteen individuals in the neighborhood – which was, and continues to be, a predominantly Irish nationalist area.

One image became notably memorable.

Pictures showed a religious figure, Fr Edward Daly, displaying a stained with blood fabric in his effort to protect a crowd moving a youth, the injured teenager, who had been fatally wounded.

Journalists captured extensive video on the day.

Historical records features Father Daly telling a media representative that soldiers "appeared to fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no provocation for the shooting.

The narrative of what happened wasn't accepted by the initial investigation.

The Widgery Tribunal found the soldiers had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the peace process, the ruling party commissioned a new investigation, in response to advocacy by bereaved relatives, who said the first investigation had been a inadequate investigation.

That year, the report by the inquiry said that on balance, the military personnel had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the individuals had presented danger.

The contemporary Prime Minister, the Prime Minister, expressed regret in the Parliament – saying deaths were "without justification and unacceptable."

Authorities began to look into the matter.

An ex-soldier, identified as the accused, was charged for murder.

He was charged over the fatalities of one victim, 22, and twenty-six-year-old another victim.

The defendant was also accused of trying to kill multiple individuals, Joseph Friel, further individuals, Michael Quinn, and an unidentified individual.

There is a legal order preserving the defendant's privacy, which his attorneys have maintained is necessary because he is at threat.

He testified the Saville Inquiry that he had solely shot at people who were armed.

The statement was dismissed in the official findings.

Information from the inquiry could not be used straightforwardly as proof in the legal proceedings.

In the dock, the accused was screened from view with a blue curtain.

He spoke for the first time in court at a hearing in late 2024, to respond "not responsible" when the allegations were put to him.

Family members of those who were killed on that day journeyed from the city to the judicial building each day of the trial.

John Kelly, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they always knew that attending the trial would be difficult.

"I visualize everything in my mind's eye," John said, as we examined the key areas discussed in the case – from the location, where the victim was shot dead, to the adjoining the courtyard, where James Wray and the second person were killed.

"It reminds me to where I was that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and lay him in the medical transport.

"I experienced again the entire event during the proceedings.

"But even with enduring all that – it's still worthwhile for me."